Not so sure about this. The thumb looks a bit stubby. Or maybe it's jsut the camera angle?
What does everyone else think? Diane is the V-hand expert. Do we have two stunt hands, Di?
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Beatlelady wondered...
...about Bobby's hands in Legion, so let's have a peek.
No doubt this is Vincent's lovely hand.
Not so sure about this. The thumb looks a bit stubby. Or maybe it's jsut the camera angle?
I mean, compare it to this vision. No doubts here. And it's streamlined by comparison.
As for this - well, it looks a bit too lined to be Vincent's baby-smooth appendage.
What does everyone else think? Diane is the V-hand expert. Do we have two stunt hands, Di? And Beatlelady, here's the first slideshow I ever made, which should appeal to both your obsessions.
Not so sure about this. The thumb looks a bit stubby. Or maybe it's jsut the camera angle?
What does everyone else think? Diane is the V-hand expert. Do we have two stunt hands, Di?
Two stunt hands, IMO, but I could be wrong. Great slide show, Val!
ReplyDeleteDefinately two stunt hands. Some great groin shots in the slide show.
ReplyDeletehmmmmm... I think they're the genuine article, the real thing; it's just the way they're shot, but the shape of the nails all look the same to me
ReplyDeletejust playing catch up... sorry to read your forum woes; I've never bothered with those places, your blog, Eliza's and Tess and Diane's provide me with more than enough Vincent for me to handle every day of the week
Life's too short to spend it bitching...
I thought they were the real thing too. Remember, his thumb is curved at the top. But I'll have to defer to our resident hand expert: Diane!
ReplyDeleteEeeek. Oh No...Stunt Hands. No way, on Gods Good Earth are those Vincent's..
ReplyDeleteThanks so much!
ReplyDeleteThey're definitely stunt hands. The last one is too red. In the second one, the knuckles are too big. Why do they think he needs stunt hands??
The slideshow was great! (Sorry it's a new comment, I my first comment was before I saw the show).
ReplyDeleteYou're so sweet.
Creating and editing in shots of a characters hands (into a scene) is probably more efficient to do with "stunt hands." It would be less taxing on the primary actors, who have other things to do, like prepare for the next scene, etc. So they shoot those elements of the scene without the major actors around. If they do a typical 3-camera set-up, those hand close-ups would most likely be shot separately.
ReplyDeleteAnything, wrinkly, stubby or excessive tanned are cleary not the D'evine One's digits. I think we kind of agree the stunt hands take over while the real ones are otherwise occupied....and we all know where we'd LIKE them to be occupied ;0)
ReplyDeletelol @ your hand obsession! His hands don't do it for me. Don't hate me! LOL But thinking of what they could do to me ... now that works!
ReplyDeleteAnyway Val ... I have an award for you ... because you do make my day :)